| DISPUTE: Gracealona v. Edo Edi Essum | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Rasvidi Admin
Posts : 669 Join date : 2010-06-05 Age : 34 Location : Ottawa, Canada
| Subject: DISPUTE: Gracealona v. Edo Edi Essum Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:57 am | |
| I'm putting this thread here so that the SoC can mediate the dispute between Grace and EEE.
The SoC is conducting this and you will all follow his rules. Respect his ruling, and if you have a dispute then go before the Chancellors. | |
|
| |
Gracealona Admin
Posts : 488 Join date : 2010-03-23 Location : Colorado, USA (Mountain Standard Time)
| Subject: Re: DISPUTE: Gracealona v. Edo Edi Essum Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:59 am | |
| I intend to follow the SoC ruling, I put that post up for a ruling from him. My whole thing is that EEE is ignoring another SoC ruling by switching to Edesus. Okay I'm done, I know I'm raging and I need to stop. | |
|
| |
Oscalantine
Posts : 542 Join date : 2010-10-22 Age : 33 Location : Seoul, South Korea
Honor:
| Subject: Re: DISPUTE: Gracealona v. Edo Edi Essum Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:20 am | |
| Bah... EEE and Grace rage at each other WAYYYYY too much. Let's see... so the name change wasn't just an RP, but rather entire change of country? That was new news to me. Alright, since Grace pointed it out, I won't repeat myself: I did say that I'll reconsider the edit of economy if EEE did put up an economic recovery thread. And he did. It is a good step forward. I respect that. Unlike SOMEONE HERE THAT SPENDS EPIC AMOUNTS OF CRAP (*cough*rasvidi*cough*), he acknowledged that his country needs to have economic recovery. So I am willing to reconsider my decision about changing his economic status once his recovery comes around. With that in mind... there are some things that EEE did wrong. It will be simpler to just list it so here I go: 1. EEE changed countries. That was completely unnecessary, as I will openly state in both SoC thread as well as put in the EEE database that his country had a change of economic dollar. Should such change be outdated (dictated by me or the country in question), the change will be revoked for the current database in NSeconomy. Keep in mind, though, that I get the final saying as to whether the change to the economy is outdated or not. Most likely I'll say that increase the econ calc by + or - certain dollars so that it can flow as normal economy does. 2. NS fluke or not, EEE deserved every bit of that econ redux. If NS didn't do it, I would've with my rule. EEE was spending so much, and he had little export. Money doesn't grow on trees, and EEE was spending so much. Now, since my scolding (sorry dude!!! ) he has gotten control over the spending. That could be seen in numerous ways. However, do keep in mind that you deserved that economic rating. 3. Lastly, if you really wanted to change countries in the RP, you MUST remind me about the change. It doesn't matter whether you have said it or not in the RP. You must PM or TG me (or post a thread in the SoC office) that you have changed. That is sort of unspoken rule that you and I made, actually. (remember, EEE? You were the first one to bring that up, and I dictated it as such) So here's my verdict: EEE, please bring back your old country and change your name back, unless you REALLY want to keep this country in here. I shall change the economy according to the RP and how it goes. Grace, you were right in saying that the countryswaping is definitely not cool with me, but you were a bit raging when you were saying that economic recovery RP was not valid. I believe that EEE made a solid START. He didn't get the economic recovery... yet... but he did start that road. Having construction projects and creating favorable conditions for companies to come to your country is definitely going to start the circulation of money. I would say that capitalizing the market a bit would speed up the process even more, but government comes first. Another thing... EEE, I have yet to respond to your economic recovery post because you didn't edit out what I put. Please check the TG. If you want a repeat of what I posted, I'll gladly send you another TG. But seriously, 80k plantations? Grace, you should be calling out EEE on that, not on how his economy sucks Hopefully that is a decision that makes everyone happy. Grace, you are right, and EEE, you have started a solid step forward. Everyone wins... right? | |
|
| |
Holy Edesu SocialistState Moderator
Posts : 939 Join date : 2010-09-10 Age : 30 Location : Madison, WI
| Subject: Re: DISPUTE: Gracealona v. Edo Edi Essum Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:01 pm | |
| 1. A secondary purpose of switching countries was being able to rename EEE HESS. Perhaps I can switch them when Edesus hits 50RPmil so that I can achieve that name?
2. I agree fully, Osc.
3. I tried to show everyone that specific recovery post by begging their attention on the RMB.
OK, then. EEE is back. (It's still called HESS, though. Edo Edi Essum is just Latin for devour, which is stupid. Om nom nom.)
I thought 80K plantations was reasonable. The US has 6.8 million farms, and HESS definitely puts much more emphasis on farming than the US does. And all the not-desert land is quite arable. It's (sub-)tropical. | |
|
| |
Gracealona Admin
Posts : 488 Join date : 2010-03-23 Location : Colorado, USA (Mountain Standard Time)
| Subject: Re: DISPUTE: Gracealona v. Edo Edi Essum Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:31 pm | |
| Yes I'm happy with this verdict. I also think that the plan to beef up EEEs economy if he RPs more recovery is better than allowing him to switch to Edesus. I think thats more fair and I'd be much happier doing that. And EEE, if you want to be called HESS, you don't need to switch your nation, we'll call you HESS . I know that wasn't your main reason for switching but I know it was one of them. | |
|
| |
Rasvidi Admin
Posts : 669 Join date : 2010-06-05 Age : 34 Location : Ottawa, Canada
| Subject: Re: DISPUTE: Gracealona v. Edo Edi Essum Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:29 pm | |
| Yay, bureaucracy! And hey, it's not my fault that a billion dollars is a drop in the ocean for me...
Anyways if you guys still have a dispute you can go before the Chancellors, I think is how it works. | |
|
| |
Holy Edesu SocialistState Moderator
Posts : 939 Join date : 2010-09-10 Age : 30 Location : Madison, WI
| Subject: Re: DISPUTE: Gracealona v. Edo Edi Essum Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:59 pm | |
| - Rasvidi wrote:
- Yay, bureaucracy! And hey, it's not my fault that a billion dollars is a drop in the ocean for me...
Anyways if you guys still have a dispute you can go before the Chancellors, I think is how it works. That's difficult when I'm the only person who shows up to our elections. Am I all three chancellors? If so, I may be able to convince our regional government to give EEE a generous break. | |
|
| |
Gracealona Admin
Posts : 488 Join date : 2010-03-23 Location : Colorado, USA (Mountain Standard Time)
| Subject: Re: DISPUTE: Gracealona v. Edo Edi Essum Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:10 pm | |
| We haven't had another election yet. As of now those listed on the Regional page are still our chancellors, even if they are MIA. | |
|
| |
Holy Edesu SocialistState Moderator
Posts : 939 Join date : 2010-09-10 Age : 30 Location : Madison, WI
| Subject: Re: DISPUTE: Gracealona v. Edo Edi Essum Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:20 pm | |
| I believe an election is in order. Grace, you organize this one. I want to be a chancellor. Censi (Is that a word?) are boring. | |
|
| |
Gracealona Admin
Posts : 488 Join date : 2010-03-23 Location : Colorado, USA (Mountain Standard Time)
| Subject: Re: DISPUTE: Gracealona v. Edo Edi Essum Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:39 pm | |
| Yes one is in order. I'm waiting until we decide what we are going to do about positions and such though. You know that whole discussion going on on what changes to make, I'm waitng for us to reach a decision | |
|
| |
Holy Edesu SocialistState Moderator
Posts : 939 Join date : 2010-09-10 Age : 30 Location : Madison, WI
| Subject: Re: DISPUTE: Gracealona v. Edo Edi Essum Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:19 pm | |
| - Gracealona wrote:
- Yes one is in order. I'm waiting until we decide what we are going to do about positions and such though. You know that whole discussion going on on what changes to make, I'm waitng for us to reach a decision
Until a major amendment is passed to alter our regional government, we best organize an election. We still need legitimately elected chancellors and census taker(s). | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: DISPUTE: Gracealona v. Edo Edi Essum | |
| |
|
| |
| DISPUTE: Gracealona v. Edo Edi Essum | |
|