| New requirements? | |
|
|
Should map placement and expansion have a recruit requirement? | Yes | | 29% | [ 2 ] | No | | 43% | [ 3 ] | I don't care | | 28% | [ 2 ] |
| Total Votes : 7 | | |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Rasvidi Admin
Posts : 669 Join date : 2010-06-05 Age : 34 Location : Ottawa, Canada
| Subject: New requirements? Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:37 pm | |
| Was thinking, to ensure regional activity, was thinking of making it a requirement that you send out three recruitment telegrams to three different nations/regions before you get added to a map or have an expansion honoured.
You'd have to list the three nations/regions you sent telegrams to. I am thinking of making it retroactive, so all existing nations would have to do this as well for every expansion and such they have made as well as their initial placement. You don't need to successfully recruit anyone, you just need to send out the telegram and that is it.
I'm hoping it would stimulate regional and roleplay activity. This would be a temporary measure. As always, my decision will be based on a referenda and if more then 50% of those polled decide against this, I will not go through with it. And again, as always, vote cancelling is allowed in case you change your mind. This will be on the table indefinitely. | |
|
| |
Holy Edesu SocialistState Moderator
Posts : 939 Join date : 2010-09-10 Age : 30 Location : Madison, WI
| Subject: Re: New requirements? Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:49 pm | |
| If enacted, this policy definitely shouldn't apply to new recruits. The first plot should always be free. Expansions could have a cost. | |
|
| |
Isis Rakael
Posts : 196 Join date : 2010-08-16 Age : 40 Location : FL, USA
| Subject: Re: New requirements? Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:00 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Gracealona Admin
Posts : 488 Join date : 2010-03-23 Location : Colorado, USA (Mountain Standard Time)
| Subject: Re: New requirements? Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:02 am | |
| No, they'll either just recruit some nation that will move here and never become active or create a puppet and move it here. | |
|
| |
KingIsaac
Posts : 254 Join date : 2010-09-04
| Subject: Re: New requirements? Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:49 am | |
| This is NOT a good idea.
I mean, having no working government is already a stain in our reputation. And a compulsory recruitment just to participate in THE ONLY source of activity in the region would be like a big slap.
NAY. And I am encouraging EVERYBODY to vote NAY. | |
|
| |
Rasvidi Admin
Posts : 669 Join date : 2010-06-05 Age : 34 Location : Ottawa, Canada
| Subject: Re: New requirements? Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:33 pm | |
| Alright, the voices have spoken, I won't do this. You guys really like to shoot down my ideas | |
|
| |
Gracealona Admin
Posts : 488 Join date : 2010-03-23 Location : Colorado, USA (Mountain Standard Time)
| Subject: Re: New requirements? Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:10 pm | |
| - KingIsaac wrote:
I mean, having no working government is already a stain in our reputation. I dissagree with that, I don't think it's a stain on us whatsoever. I mean nations don't come here and leave because they can't vote on bills and crap or become president of the region. I think we're just fine without one | |
|
| |
Isis Rakael
Posts : 196 Join date : 2010-08-16 Age : 40 Location : FL, USA
| Subject: Re: New requirements? Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:08 pm | |
| - Rasvidi wrote:
- Alright, the voices have spoken, I won't do this. You guys really like to shoot down my ideas
If I didn't have your ideas to rage at, I'd rage at EEE. You're a peacekeeper! | |
|
| |
Holy Edesu SocialistState Moderator
Posts : 939 Join date : 2010-09-10 Age : 30 Location : Madison, WI
| Subject: Re: New requirements? Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:19 pm | |
| - Isis Rakael wrote:
- Rasvidi wrote:
- Alright, the voices have spoken, I won't do this. You guys really like to shoot down my ideas
If I didn't have your ideas to rage at, I'd rage at EEE. You're a peacekeeper! Don't worry. I'll find something stupid to rant about that deserves an equally angry rant. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: New requirements? | |
| |
|
| |
| New requirements? | |
|